What is Trauma?


Trauma can mean very different things to different people. We see the word trauma being thrown around all over the place in a variety of conversations, be they in the media, online or elsewhere. And, very interesting to me (hang on a minute while I put on my nerd hat..), this lack of clarity on what we mean by trauma also occurs in the scientific literature.1 Part of my doctoral research looked at exactly this and my research found that trauma is defined in widely varying ways within scholarly research. I analyzed all the components of trauma definitions and, of course, came up with my own.

Here’s what I found. Across the board, every trauma definition typically consists of two components. First, there is some sort of traumatic event, or series of events. Something happens to someone. Second, there is some type of negative impact that results from the traumatic event or events. And by negative, I just mean there is some degree of negative impact on the individual’s health and well-being. There is a whole host of clinical research trying to understand why some people experience trauma while others, exposed to the same or similar event(s), don’t seem to be affected. Personally, for the purposes of this content, I don’t think that’s particularly important. Scientifically, I think it’s only important to help us better understand how to minimize or protect against trauma.

What I think is really important is that whether or not you are affected by trauma exposure has nothing to do with how ‘strong’ or ‘weak’ you are. Because I am a clinician, I often use clinical analogies. When someone comes into ER with a broken leg, we don’t stew over why their leg broke. Yes, in rare cases there can be concern about whether or not the patient has ‘brittle bones’ as this could be an indication of osteoporosis, which will require further investigation, but by and large when osteoporosis is not of concern, the why doesn’t really matter because a broken bone is a broken bone. We don’t look at the patient and consider them weak. We need to think about our minds in the same way. There are any number of valid, credible and very important reasons why some people exposed to some circumstances will be significantly impacted and others may not. Weak mindedness has nothing to do with it.

So, let’s get back to how we can define and understand trauma. After I did a whole bunch of data collection and analysis, here’s the definition I came up with based on what research evidence tells us about trauma. I define trauma as when an event, or series of events, overwhelm an individual’s capacity to psychologically self-regulate and can negatively affect the individual’s internal well-being, inter-personal relationships and functioning in society. That might sound all scientific-y and very jargon-y, but in a nutshell here’s what I mean.

It’s really important to recognize that trauma can manifest in different ways because people are different. There is one common theme, however, and that is when a person is ‘trauma-affected’, meaning they are struggling in some way with some type of trauma exposure, it always affects their emotional regulation or ‘internal well-being’. Some people become very angry and aggressive. Others can become very withdrawn and quiet. Or there can be some combination of the two. But the classic hallmark of trauma, across the board, is some type of mental/emotional alteration or disruption. This is what I mean by ‘internal well-being’. There is a disruption to, or loss of, overall internal (mental/emotional) well-being. And then there are the trickle-down effects of this disruption to our internal well-being.

Trauma often, although not always, impacts our ability to maintain healthy interpersonal relationships, and trauma can also impact or disrupt our ability to maintain our general functioning in society, meaning we may not be able to function as well (or at all) in school or work or whatever our daily routine or occupation is. I also want to point out that while many people assume the ‘event or series of events’ typically mean event or events we experience directly (meaning something is done to us or we experience a natural disaster or some type of accident ourselves), the event or series events could be via others’ experiences. This is known as secondary trauma or vicarious trauma meaning that the trauma exposure occurs via another individual or group of people relaying their experiences of trauma. This is very applicable to police officers and prosecutors, as just a few examples, in that they are often and repeatedly exposed to horrific events via the gathering and processing of evidence and testimony.

As a quick sidenote, perhaps the most helpful talk I’ve heard on secondary trauma was by Dr. John Bradford, a top Canadian forensic psychiatrist who was involved in two of Canada’s most high-profile criminal trials involving sexual offences. You can find his talk on Youtube by searching his name plus Canadian Depression Research and Intervention Network. The video was uploaded on May 19, 2015. While I found his presentation incredibly insightful, please know that it may be triggering.

One thing I can’t stress enough is that we (being researchers, clinicians, and the general public) should never qualify or quantify what is ‘valid’ trauma and what isn’t. I’ve seen this happen both professionally and personally when people will ‘disqualify’ trauma because it wasn’t ‘bad enough’. We never have the right to judge another’s experiences and subsequent suffering. Understanding trauma is not about ranking how ‘bad’ the event(s) was, but rather it’s about understanding the impact. Some people will talk about ‘big T trauma’ versus ‘little t trauma’. I think this can be helpful in recognizing that ‘little t trauma’ can be just as impactful and is no less credible, but I also think we need to be careful about ranking or scoring what is big T versus little t.

That doesn’t matter. What matters is recognizing your mental health and well-being have been altered in some way because of something you’ve experienced or been exposed to and you might need some help in navigating the way forward. End of story. No judgement. No shame. No further qualifications required. If you are hurting and suffering, you are owed support and understanding and compassionate care.

If you are looking for support on how to build your own customized trauma recovery plan,
I’d love to see if I can help. You can book a call with me here:

Bargeman M, Smith S, Wekerle C. (2020). Trauma-informed care as a rights-based “standard of care”: A critical review. Child Abuse & Neglect.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0145213420304178?via%3Dihub

Copyright 2024 Resilient Trauma Recovery | All Rights Reserved.